Mohammed Isa Al Abbasi 
The Minister of Justice, Abd al -Latif Wehbe, continues his “legal campaign” against the associations of “Protection of Public Money”, stressing this time that “these societies cannot be enabled by the right to install themselves as a party demanding for civil right”, and he registered that they “pay with great fallacies regarding public money”, adding: “There is no money in this description, but there are credits that are counted from the state Responsible for it before Parliament and the inspection committees.
Wehbe added, during the discussion of Article 7 of the draft criminal procedure law, today, Wednesday, that “public money` `walker Saib ‘comes until another party comes and demands the civil right in it,” considering that “censorship is a parliamentary work. Related to money. ”
Article 7 of the project states the following: “The right to filed the civil lawsuit to compensate for the damage caused by a felony, misdemeanor or violation, for everyone who personally suffered physical, material or moral damage caused by the crime directly,” noting that “the associations recognized as public benefit and obtained permission to litigate from the governmental authority charged with justice, according to the controls determined by an organizational text, can stand up Civil, if it was established legally four years ago before the criminal act was committed, in the event that the public lawsuit was filed by the Public Prosecution or the Civil Party regarding a crime that affects its field of interest stipulated in its basic law.
The minister asked: “What is the legal support that depends on a clear jurisprudence principle that gives associations the right to claim the civil right?” He added sarcastically: “If we enable it to this specialization, there is no problem that also enables them to collect taxes.” One is ashamed to say that he is a parliamentarian or a group president.
The government official also asked: “Are we defending the principle even though he is offensive? Or we put the principle, clarify it, and leave with that field open to attack the state, the elected and democracy? Do we sacrifice and control now and later if things improved, the legislative text can be modified or we remove the validity of the legislation from our hands for the sake of these societies that strike parliament and legislation? Organizations want to exercise both sins. ”
Wehbe continued: “There is something that is not straightforward in this process.” This logic claims that the only corrupt in the country is the elected official. “He explained:” Defending democracy must be in its broad sense. “
The Minister of Justice emphasized that “the auctions offend democracy,” considering that “these associations are followed, but they are not followed. “By God, they have no one in one thing.”
Wehbe added: “These people are carrying out campaigns against people who sold their receivables, and on our part we must take care of the particles that threaten the democracy that gives Parliament the right to hold the prime minister accountable.”
