
Many couples fall under enormous pressure while searching for a means of separation without losses if the other party caused – with a problem – with which his life partner cannot continue in the relationship because of the damages that occurred, whether material or moral, .. And during the series (Leave your mind) we monitor the most prominent mistakes that if the partners of life are threatened with losing their legitimate rights and entering the stubbornness between them to take revenge and torture each other The correct legal procedures needed to recover the threatening rights of the parties to the judicial dispute if either parties fail to pay it.
– The legislator stipulated in the marriage contract legal and legal conditions that must be met in order for the marriage contract to be correct.
– The contractor must be an adult, sane, free, and rational, in which there is no defect in contentment, such as foolishness or dementia, and that the contract is not built on fraud, fraud, and hiding the defects that are impossible with it.
Law No. 25 of 1920 did not address the organization the issue of authorizing the husband the option of annulment of the marriage contract for the disadvantage of the wife or for fraud and fraud.
– The law emphasized the husband’s right to end the marital relationship with his individual will and does not need a breakdown lawsuit.
– If the husband wants to annul a reason outside his will and the wife demands her full rights as if there is a fundamental defect that I hid for it as one of the diseases with which it is impossible for marital cohabitation, or incurable diseases by virtue of the people of jurisdiction, and the last period of the right to nullify the contract or annul it three years of discovering the error.
Article 9 of Law No. 25 of 1920 regarding the provisions of alimony and some issues of personal status included the limitation of the wife’s right alone without the husband in the request for a distinction between her and her husband if she finds a defective defect.
– The text of the second paragraph of Article 11 bis of Law No. 25 of 1929 regarding some provisions of personal status added to Law No. 100 of 1985, the wife’s right to request divorce for harm if her husband married her without her consent, and the Constitutional Court supported this article.