Know the value of financial compensation in cases of failure to implement the ruling of vision

Issues of vision and disputes that arise between husbands and wives, do not know the end, in light of the intransigence of some wives and their refusal to implement the rulings of vision that are not repeated only once every week, and even if they are repeated, it is in most cases the rule of vision is implemented on paper only in many times, what puts parents in a dilemma due to the failure to implement these rulings, so they remain before them except resorting to the court to equate them and search for their right to care Their children, so that the law is keen to set controls and penalties to ensure the preservation of the interests of children and their psychological and physical safety as a priority if the relationship between the spouses ends with separation.

During the following lines, we monitor the value of financial compensation in cases of failure to implement the rule of vision and the penalties defined by the law on those who deprive the non -incubating party of communicating with its young.

– The vision lawsuit in Article 20 of Law 25 of 1920, replaced by Law No. 4 of 2005, and stipulates that “each of the parents has the right to see the young or small, and for grandparents such as that when the parents are not present, if the vision cannot be organized an agreement organized by the judge.”

– The incubator is obligated to implement the ruling of the vision in favor of her “husband – her absolute”, and if her backwardness is proven, the husband has the right to prove this and filed a lawsuit to drop her right to nursery, and a lawsuit to drop the custody is filed before the competent family court after bringing what indicates that the mother does not attend the place where the rule of vision is implemented.

– It is required to prove the failure to implement the ruling of the vision, to prove a case, by the father to go to the police station to edit a report.

– Proof of the father not implementing the ruling can use it as a document in the Court of Compensation to obtain financial compensation “in exchange for the damage caused by him due to the failure to implement the ruling of vision,” and the father can also establish a misdemeanor not to implement a judicial ruling.

-According to the law, whoever makes a mistake a cause of harm to others, whoever commits compensation is required, provided that the error is negligent by violating a legal obligation and affects the victim in his body, money, or literary, which affects the victim in his feeling or affection.

– Whether the father or mother is punished, if one of them deprives the other of his child’s vision, a fine of no less than one thousand pounds and not more than five thousand pounds.

– According to the text of Article 163 of the Civil Code, that every mistake is a cause of harm to others, it is necessary for those who committed compensation, and obliging those who refrain from implementing the ruling of vision, by paying a sum of money as compensation amounting to 50 thousand pounds for the material and literary damage that afflicted the victim from the failure to implement the vision.