Lebanon is internationally supported between the dismantle of the northern and southern pliers … Jaber’s words do not express the opinion

Since the signing of the ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel last January, the interpretation of the item related to the disarmament of Hezbollah is still a problem between the party and the astronomy in which it is going on, which considers that the party implemented the agreement and withdrew from the southern Litani, which pulls the excuse from the hand of Israel in its continued violation of the agreement, and between the rest of the political components that read in the agreement, the inclusion of the withdrawal south of the Litani and the north Israel adheres to the pretext of Lebanon’s lack of commitment to its side, and it justifies its continuation in its violations and attacks.

While the confrontations intensify on the Lebanese -Syrian border, and the large and disturbing movement of the Syrians in the direction of Akkar and the border areas, Lebanon appears to be legitimate on two dangers on both sides of its wild borders, practically threatening the army’s ability to assume its responsibilities in maintaining security and border protection and implementing the international resolution 1701 judge to spread and disarm the party, in light of limited and brutal capabilities that are not sufficient for the great role assigned to it, which is the matter He puts him between the jaws of Syrian Israeli pliers, which exceeds the dangers of all international support and momentum to protect its stability, and it raises disturbing question marks about what the plan to open a front aims at the northern border in conjunction with the South Front continuing the same.

The proposal of the “Lebanese Forces” ministers on the table of the cabinet in the penultimate session did not lead the issue of weapons in order to propose a session of the Supreme Defense Council to set a clear program to disarm the Lebanese and non -Lebanese armed groups, to any result or follow -up after the party minister considered that the issue is not a priority today in light of the continued Israeli occupation of points in the south, which closed the discussion in the issue at the session, in order to avoid the explosion of any dispute that affects the ministerial solidarity and reflects Divisions of opinion on the issues raised, especially since the government’s priority today lies in the achievement of the restoration of powers by approving appointments in all their forms. In light of this foggy scene regarding the implementation of the international decision, the eve of the upcoming visit of the President of the Republic to Paris, and the Lebanese reliance on a prospective movement of the French President to sharpen international support to help Lebanon, and the day and the visit of the International Monetary Fund delegation, which seemed clear his insistence on achieving economic and financial reforms before any program, formed the words of the Minister of Finance Yassin Jaber a surprise to the political milieu about whether he expresses the opinion of the government or the council president Nabih Berri together. The Minister of Al -Mal stressed in his speech that the party’s weapon file is not a barter in exchange for international support, noting that “the implementation of the international decision witnessed progress as weapons were almost withdrawn from the south, and if the matter was not done, Israel would not be withdrawn,” noting that “the other stages come with time,” considering that “the withdrawal of the rest of the weapons in the Lebanese regions north of Litani will not take place within weeks.” Jaber explained his speech by saying, “The completion of the operation requires the army’s readiness, recalling the decision of the Council of Ministers to adapt 4,500 new soldiers, allowing us to say to the Lebanese society that the security forces are ready to be able to maintain security, and over time, the weapon is withdrawn.” The question: Does Jaber reflect the opinion of President Berri and the party, and can it be placed in a field that the process of completing the withdrawal of weapons is continuing and will take a few weeks, which means that the party was delivered with what is stipulated in the international decision by the inclusiveness of the north of Litani in its singsy, on the basis that the joining of new elements to the army would reduce pressure on the military establishment and allow it to complete the deployment?

Informed sources denied this to be a land opinion, noting that the Speaker of the Council expresses his opinion, putting the situation in the category of the government in which Jaber is a member, meaning that this is what the government sees regarding the completion of the disarmament process. But what is certain for these sources is that Jaber’s words do not express the position of the party that refuses in any form of talking about the north of Litani before Israel withdrew from the five points.

[email protected]

Kadr: The Minister of Finance talk about disarmament from the northern Litani within weeks does not express the opinion of the party or the president of the council and does not include a delivery of the matter.