Hezbollah is resentful to Lebanon’s position on Israel’s violations: there is no exclusive to the weapon

Violations of the occupation army continues to the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, especially its south and its capacity, on the impact of Israeli assurances of continuing its operations “until the elimination of Hezbollah sites and leaders”, in addition to stressing the stay in the five border hills, which raises questions about the Lebanese reaction divided into the way to deal with these attacks.

The Prime Minister of the occupation government, Benjamin Netanyahu, said yesterday, Thursday, that “the army controls locations inside southern Lebanon, and will remain concentrated in it,” in a statement coinciding with a series of Israeli raids on areas in the Lebanese Bekaa, as well as the intense violations of the Lebanese atmosphere, including the capital Beirut. Lebanese official sources assert to Al -Arabi Al -Jadeed that “the Lebanese state, represented by President Joseph Aoun, is making all possible efforts to stop the violations, the withdrawal of the occupation from the five hills, and the liberation of all Lebanese prisoners, and it has made indirect negotiations, and its efforts will be completed in this framework,” denying any proposal or research on the issue of normalization, stressing that “the issue is not permanent With the withdrawal of Israel from its entire lands. “

A parliamentary source in Hezbollah told Al -Arabi Al -Jadeed that “the Israeli persistence is no longer acceptable, and the Lebanese state has moved to stop these attacks. The fact that America is implementing the Israeli agenda, “and the source notes that” there are in the state who are subject to American pressure and threats not to help Lebanon and support reconstruction except in the event of disarming Hezbollah and disrupting any role for it, while it is its duty to face all the risks facing the country, and to cut the way for any attempts to impose external projects, aspirations and expansionist Israeli ambitions and ambitions, including the normalization that promotes it Israeli.

The source notes that “the state should not be subject to external conditions, but rather it must put an end to it, and move seriously to remove the occupation from all the Lebanese lands it occupies, and to assume its national responsibilities towards the reconstruction.” National, not a party, and in any way it is possible to justify the Israeli violations of the Israeli violations, but rather it must be confronted. “

The source stresses that “Hezbollah leaves the state the issue of protecting the country and defending its lands and rights, but patience has limits, and it is not possible to talk about disarmament or limiting it in the hands of the state, in light of the continued Israeli occupation and dangers on the country.” Armed organizations in Lebanon, “noting that” we are freed Lebanon from the Israeli occupation thanks to the international community, and this is the reality, but so that the international community helps us and presses the Israeli we have to respect the part related to us from Resolution 1701. “

Raji criticizes the option of resistance, considering that he brought Lebanon to the current situation, asking: “If the resistance at the height of its power has been unable during the war of attribution to prevent Israel from occupying our lands in the south, violating our atmosphere, implementing its assassinations, and destroying southern towns and villages, all the way to Beirut, is it able today to do so?” Lebanon, especially in light of the tremendous international pressure that requires any aid or financing to implement relevant international decisions.

The ministers affiliated with the Lebanese Forces Party, the most recent of which is in the government session held yesterday, Thursday, to raise the issue of setting a time limit for the disarmament of Hezbollah on the table, and thus restricting arms in the hands of the state, knowing that the ministerial statement of the government of Nawaf Salam did not specify any deadline for that, and according to the information of the “New Arab”, Salam stressed that “this issue will be raised and discussed on a national level, and the government is committed In her ministerial statement.

This atmosphere, Hezbollah replied today, Friday, with a remarkable position for the President of the Executive Council, Ali Sufoosh, in which he said that “the resistance today gives the state the opportunity to do its duties towards its people and its citizens, and notify them that there is a country that stands by their side and protects them, defends them, and prevents the enemy from allowing their villages, and not only the positions Leave people from an option other than doing everything that can defend their lives and livelihoods. “

He added: “You say that the state is the one that protects the country, and it is the one that defends the homeland and weapons must be limited to the hands of the state. Today, the state is present along the border, and it has the opportunity to exercise its role, and with it weapons, and with it the committee supervising the ceasefire agreement, and with it the international community as well, so what did you do so far before the Israeli daily violations and attacks? The weapon can be limited to the hands of the state as long as there is an occupation, and when there is an ongoing occupation and aggression, the weapon is the adornment of men, and everyone must confront this occupation and all means, and this is a right that we cannot abandon, whatever the sacrifices.