
British Prime Minister Kiir Starmer announced the cancellation of the largest semi -governmental body in the world, which is the “National Health Services in England”, and returned the health service to the government’s control, amid fears of the Labor Party division about the plan to reduce social advantages, where some within the Labor Party, according to the “Guardian”, feel that the party’s direction has changed and is now heading away from the gathering behind the working class.
The Prime Minister said Thursday that the National Health Services Authority must be under the supervision of the Ministry of Health, not an independent body. The Starmer procedure is a step towards the changes to the National Health Services Authority, which was made by former Minister of Health Andrew Lansley in 2012 in the early years of the coalition between conservatives and democrats.
In a speech on the restructuring of the state, Starmer said that the National Health Services Authority in England will be canceled to “reduce bureaucracy” and re -manage health service “to democratic control.” He said that this step would provide funds for doctors, nurses and service providers on the front lines, and reduce the bureaucracy to help accelerate improvements in the National Health Services Authority, as the government aims to reduce waiting lists by the upcoming elections.
Regarding workers’ concern about their jobs, Starmer said the decisions always have their consequences. If only people focus on it, they will never accomplish anything. He continued: “It is very difficult for me to look at people who need national health service, and they have not obtained the treatment they want, at the speed they want, without any mistake, while I can do something about it.” He added: “This is the imbalance in politics, which is the unwillingness to make difficult decisions. That is why we have come to what we are now. So we have to make difficult decisions. It is clear that the workers of the National Health Services in England have high qualifications and high skills, do a great job, and we will cooperate with them in relation to what will come later. I will not give up anyone in this. But I cannot ignore those who ask for a faster date and say I can help you, but I will not do that, because I am afraid to make a difficult decision. I will not do it. ”
The British government explains on its website that since the late 1990s, the National Health Services Authority (NHS) is no longer a large body responsible for the entire UK. The National Health Services in England leads the services in England alone, while governments rejected in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland are organized and funded their health services and their care services. Some English areas are also responsible for financing healthy and social care, including Manchester and Cornwall Province.
In general, the path you follow as sick is the same throughout the United Kingdom. You start with a general doctor or any other preliminary health care provider, and refers you to other services as you need. Health care is free when providing the service, and it is funded by taxes.
The services differ in the United Kingdom. For example, in Scotland, all social care services are provided to those over 65 years old. In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, medical prescriptions are offered for free, while income fees are imposed in England.
Health Minister Wes Stretting has already supervised plans to reduce the size of the National Health Services Authority in England in half, and her executive president, Amanda Bretchard, is scheduled to leave her position at the end of this month. Strighting said Thursday that the government “will cancel the largest semi -governmental body in the world” to get rid of the National Health Services Authority in England. Its duties will be transferred to the Ministry of Health.
Stretting told members of Parliament Thursday that many members of the Conservative Party had secretly informed him that they should have been canceled Andrew Lensley’s health reforms for the year 2012, which has erected the National Health Services Authority, independently independent of the central government. He said: “I cannot count the number of conservatives who told me separately that they regret the decisions taken in 2012, and that they did not take any action while patients and tax motivated were paying the price.”
He stressed that the cancellation of the National Health Services Authority in England will provide hundreds of millions of pounds annually. He said that the work has already started to end the repetition between the National Health Services Authority in England and the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. He pointed out that the matter will take two years to restore the jobs of the National Health Services Authority in England to the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare completely.
He continued: “These reforms will significantly reduce the number of National Health Services Authority employees, which achieves great savings in hundreds of millions of pounds annually. These funds will be used in the front lines to reduce waiting times faster, and to achieve our plan to change by getting rid of the bureaucratic routine.”
Caroline Johnson, Minister of Health in the shadow government, told deputies that the Conservative Party supports “a more agile and efficient country.” And she continued: “This means using resources effectively, reducing waste, and preventing repetition, by spending money as this is more useful, and therefore we support the measures aimed at simplifying management, and we do not oppose the principles of direct control of the health service.” But she said that conservatives want guarantees regarding reorganization that will take place, how to achieve goals and maintain standards during this process.