
The March 10, 2025 agreement will be the first day in the new history of Syria, as it is the most prominent transformation in the Syrian path since the Baath rule in 1963. A Kurdish leader who leads his forces on the Syrian soil meets the Syrian president in the People’s Palace, and signs the integration and preserving the unity of Syrian territory.
Although Satan lies in the details, the wide title of this agreement is to rearrange the intentions, and to blow up the hate speech that controlled the Syrian mentality for more than half a century, even in light of the revolution, which often borrowed the literature of hate from the Arab Socialist Baath Party towards the Kurdish component.
As long as Syria has been the mini version of the Iraqi experience, since the revolution of Rashid Ali Al -Kilani in May 1941, I talk about the similarity between the Iraqi and Syrian experience to avoid the mistakes of the Iraqi experience in the last agreement between Damascus and northeastern Syria, and the consideration of this experience so that we do not establish a subsequent bad intent and political booby traps that generations will carry again.
The Kurdish issue has always been the main concern of both Iraqis and Syrians. Saddam Hussein dealt with this file at a while at one time and at other times, but it was the issue most present at the Republican Palace table in Baghdad.
In Syria, Hafez al -Assad adopted the policy of complete denial of the Kurdish issue. Assad, who is believed to be a Kurdish origin, was seeing a entire Arab Syria, and that the Kurdish situation is a strange situation on the Syrian society.
I do not want to enter the issue of numbers and statistics about the number of Kurds in Syria; Because that will open the wasps as considering the Kurds have their own literature in statistics and census, but I say that the size of the Kurdish issue in Syria certainly exceeds their number.
On March 11, 1970, an agreement was made between Mullah Mustafa Barzani, the leader of the Kurdish revolution, on the then Iraqi regime and then Iraqi Vice President Saddam Hussein, the agreement that granted the Kurds a self -rule. The image of Saddam Hussein was holding the hand of Mullah Barzani an unforgettable scene in the Middle Eastern memory, not only in Iraq but in Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Iran.
And because trust, good intentions, clarity and details were missing this agreement in creating the autonomy of the Kurds, it collapsed after only 4 years, and the fighting between Baghdad and the Kurds was renewed in northern Iraq, and the victim of this conflict went more than 100 thousand, because the image was the most distant goal of all good intentions, the two parties were hiding the daggers until the conditions exploded in another war that the Kurds still pay for it with Baghdad, despite the change of the regime.
In any case, a careful reading of the articles of the Syrian agreement finds that everything that was mentioned does not constitute controversies between the two parties, only the basic principle in what he wrote is to be constitutional until the Kurds guaranteed primarily to perpetuate their presence in the Syrian political and constitutional life, and this is part of the factors of building confidence between the two parties, and if both President Ahmed al -Shara and the commander of the “Qasd” forces are the oppressed of my servant of the harmony in the application of this agreement and overcoming the regional challenges The interior is at the level of the base surrounding the two men, so I see that Syria will be more powerful than ever, and this requires, of course, reassurances of the Turkish side in the first place, which is seen caution in this agreement because of the concerns of the expansion of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party fighters, which Ankara considers a terrorist organization on Syrian soil.
This agreement will provide Damascus with several gains; The first is to remove the Syrian democratic forces from the list of enemies and thus Damascus moves from the bosom of Moscow and Iran to the American side, given that “SDF” is allies of the United States and Western countries in general.
As for the second gain, it is the geographical, economic and vital factor in this region, which is the new Syria on the economic level, in terms of oil and gas production, human power and expatriate funds, in addition to the agricultural factor that will provide job opportunities for many forces that will leave its factional locations, and therefore this agreement if he writes success will be the lifeline for the new administration and in general in general.
One of the gains is also to expand the framework of the military force of the new administration led by Ahmed Al -Shara at the security, military and administrative levels, especially since northeastern Syria has military and security experience that reaches about 10 years during the war against ISIS.
As for the oppressed Abdi, it is the biggest winner of this agreement, especially since the United States can announce the withdrawal at any time, and therefore the Kurdish paper will go in the wind, and that the survival of northeastern Syria in the range of Turkish threats would delay development and stability, and this imposes on Damascus and northeastern Syria to find clear and explicit solutions to deal with Turkish concerns and spare the region with a flaming focus without a solution.
So we are in front of the (winner Rabeh) agreement if it is dealt with carefully and professionally, and that Turkey and the Arab countries are also part of this agreement to succeed, because it is the most important agreement signed since the fall of the Bashar al -Assad regime on December 8, 2024.
Endowments of the agreement:
– Ensuring the rights of all Syrians to represent and participate in the political process and all state institutions based on efficiency, regardless of their religious and ethnic backgrounds.
– The Kurdish society is an authentic society in the Syrian state, and the Syrian state guarantees its right to citizenship and all its constitutional rights.
The ceasefire on all Syrian lands.
Merging all civil and military institutions in northeastern Syria within the administration of the Syrian state, including border crossings, airport and oil and gas fields.
– Ensuring the return of all Syrian displaced people to their towns and villages, and securing their protection from the Syrian state.
– Supporting the Syrian state in its control of the remnants of Assad (Bashar al -Assad’s regime) and all the threats that threaten its security and unity.
Rejection of the calls for division, hate speech, and attempts to spread sedition between all components of Syrian society.
The executive committees seek to implement the agreement that does not exceed the end of the current year.
Related news