Is Amr Diab have the right to resort to cassation after being convicted of slapping the young man? .. Details

After the Court of Appeal of New Cairo misdemeanor ruled, supporting the ruling issued by the fine of the artist Amr Diab, 200 pounds, after being convicted of slapping the young Saad Osama during one of the concerts, explaining the seventh day in the following points. Is Amr Diab entitled to veto the veto to challenge the ruling issued?

According to the Egyptian law, the ruling becomes final and it is not permissible to veto it, given that the fine is less than 20 thousand pounds, and therefore the judicial decision becomes the first ruling in Amr Diab’s criminal record.

The lawyer Ashraf Abdel Aziz, the defense of the artist, Amr Diab, was resuming an appeal against the sentence of fining his client 200 pounds and paying his compensation 10 thousand pounds to the young Saad Osama on charges of assaulting him.

It is noteworthy that the prosecution referred Amr Diab to the Misdemeanor Court on charges of slapping a young man during a party inside a hotel, and the prosecution also referred the young man on charges of assaulting the artist Amr Diab.

Earlier, the investigation authorities listened to the statements of the young man, who is the incident of the supreme incident at the hands of the artist Amr Diab during one of the concerts.

The young man confirmed in the investigations that while taking a photo with the artist Amr Diab, he slapped him on his face, and his river in front of the audience … while Amr Diab accused the young man of harassing, provoking and assaulting him during the ceremony.