Abdullah Al-Haqim 
The sorrows will not remain in the dirt. The last scenes of the masses in the villages of the south indicate that they have turned into exhale in the breasts. The issuance of all the Lebanese, because the homelands are integrated bodies, so how if the homeland is final according to the first line in the forefront of the Lebanese constitution, and it is the only constitution in the world that provides for such confirmation? The whining is perhaps the time of time. Because it goes beyond the drops and those in it, which is the question that occupies the issuance of the Lebanese, which is: How does the body of the homeland come back integrated?
The fact that Lebanon today, after the war, and the war are still in the airspace, and its deadly fire from north to south, has not yet prepared all sections of its body. What body is incomplete in its ability to face life and the future?
This is what everyone realizes with the people of the south, because the various questions in the south go beyond the reconstruction to two basic issues: where is the weapon of the resistance? Where are her loyalties? That is, in the abbreviation, where is that environment that has been since the mid -nineteenth century of the basic components of the Lebanese entity, and it is the pro -Hezbollah Shiite component that has been associated with since its inception to the reference of the Islamic Republic of Iran and still? This is the main Lebanese problem today. Who is the decision? And for who prevails in the country of non -prevailing and the country of reconciliation? And for those who attend abroad in the country of brilliance and giving, which was shortened one day of September 1989, that “more than one country, it is a message of freedom and a model in the pluralism of the East as well as the West,” according to the message of the late Pope John Paul II to all bishops of the Catholic Church regarding the situation in Lebanon? And the speech of the late Pope was issued just two months before the Taif Agreement in November 1989, which said in the final of the country, after the statement of the “Islamic meeting” that was held in Dar Al -Fatwa on the date of September 22, 1983: Constitution.
What country do we look after today the world: Lebanon resistance or Lebanon is the message? Of course, the overwhelming majority of the Lebanese people, if not in particular, support the words of the Pope, then at least call for harmony and neutralizing Lebanon, openness and freedom. Note that, had it not been for this freedom, the tampering Iranian hand would not have been able to control the Lebanese decision in all its aspects. We say the Iranian hand, not “Hezbollah”, whose leadership was announced in public and on more than one occasion the absolute loyalty of Iran, and it is not a coincidence that senior Iranian officials attend the day of the funeral of Mr. Hassan Nasrallah on February 23.
The question that may come to the soft minds of school students as they believe in the national anthem organized by the poet Rashid Nakhleh and the musician Wadih Sabra was completely carried out by a hundred years ago, that is, in 1925, is: Do we really belong to one homeland, as long as the jurisdiction of the jurist in Iran is the reference of a section of the Lebanese people? And why? How did this happen in that long negligence of Ain al -Zaman, whose results were today the crisis of the coming of Iranian aircraft to Beirut, after the road was closed to communicate with Lebanon and the supplies of all kinds through Syria?
Why did Islamic Iran become a reference for a large section of the Lebanese? And how this national cohesion is restored among all components of Lebanese society, which is the only society in the East as in the West, based on diversity with this amount of religious and sectarian beliefs, and it is supposed to be everyone to remain in agreement, because there is no ethnic or linguistic differences, as is the case in countries such as Switzerland, Canada, Belgium and even Spain in Catalonia, even though they are all Christians?
The developments wanted to put Lebanon at the heart of the region’s struggles and make it a square. He did not calm down for many years. But it has not changed, because this special human formation derives its importance from being authentic, very foot and different from all the entities of the region. And the Arabs have realized this from the beginning. And the founders of the seven university in March 1945 realized that privacy and loved it. To this day, they are still friends with that experience and the friends of that institutional Arab country of the university, which is alone headed by a Christian president.
Lebanon will not change in its human formation or its political system. He needs a fence and an internal fence before the external. The question that everyone who reads these words may be answered: Have anyone be held accountable throughout the independent history, accountable for one of that layer that overwhelmed Lebanon’s reputation abroad, the class of those who misunderstood the trust and spread corruption, until Lebanon becomes a message already, and the balcony of the Arab world as described by the King of Saudi Arabia, the founder Abdul Aziz bin Saud? Of course, no one was held accountable. Here lies all the problem, and here is the promised reform as a prelude to the promised confidence.
