Mohammed Isa Al Abbasi 
The “Network of the Leaders of Public Law in Morocco” said that it had held a meeting to study a number of issues that fall within the framework of the priority of the concerns of the people and professors of public law in Morocco, specifically “the subject of the pedagogical reform that is being applied at the level of Moroccan universities; Within the colleges of legal, economic and social sciences, colleges of legal and political sciences and multidisciplinary colleges, its implications for teaching public law, the law in general, as well as discussing the conditions and capabilities of organizing the second national forum public law, and enhancing its role as a university tradition.
In a communiqué, the network of the heads of public law in Morocco, in a communication, explained that “those present at the meeting have stopped, in a quiet and responsible discussion, when reviewing and analyzing a number of imbalances that have shown the activation of this pedagogical reform since its inception, which revealed that in the absence of the required participatory approach, it did not have enough study and scrutiny that reform of this kind needs, and that it jumped on real problems that are difficult to think The Moroccan university crisis outside it, especially colleges with open access.
The communication recorded “the importance of opening a deep discussion on the status of university institutions with open access; In the forefront of the university institutions that study the law, which embraces large numbers of students, and holds their job today, by evoking the content and meaning of teaching law in today’s world, conditions and requirements for scientific research in legal, political, economic sciences, and for the most suitable college model for transformations, at the level of access, disciplines, framing, pedagogical identity and research structures, and in terms of its social, value and symbolic functions, from In order to make a greater response to the needs of the state, the economy and society, especially in light of the major waste levels that these institutions know, and the blockage of job horizons in the face of their graduates.
The same source pointed to “the urgent need to reconsider and evaluate some of the contents of the pedagogical reform,” adding that “the network sees in this context that five main issues impose itself urgently at the present time, and it needs an urgent review of the faults and temples that it showed.”
On the first case, the communication stated that “the adoption of specialization and guidance from the first year for students to enter university institutions imposed on them the necessity of choosing between university tracts they had not heard about before, and therefore did not observe the need of newly -established students at the university to have a cognitive balance that enables them to choose. It also reduced their opportunities to benefit from an integrated training in the legal sciences provided by the joint trunk system.
As for the second case, the communication confirmed that “the map of the programmed units for teaching in a common way between the specializations adopted in the legal sciences does not seem to have been the subject of an accurate study, and it seemed as if it was a literal transfer of certain experiences without regard By joint soothing. ”
Regarding the third issue, the communication indicated that “creating new paths under the names of excellence, especially in terms of the conditions for access to it and the numbers of students who study with them, as well as the way that was adopted to empty its students directly in the master’s paths, showing that in many cases it did not bear excellence except ‘name’, and that it devotes discrimination instead of making excellence.
As for the fourth case, the communication was linked to the fact that “the dumping of the teaching classes in various tracts with a large number of units in the name of ‘strength skills’, in addition to being deprived of students from studying a number of important knowledge units, left a great confusion in teaching these subjects, and it has raised the ire of students and professors alike.
The network of the heads of public law in Morocco, regarding the fifth issue, said that the “Rosetta Stone” platform, which was adopted as a way to teach foreign languages and strengthen the linguistic capabilities of students, appears to have not achieved the desired goals of them; In addition to what can be recorded on the levels of formations and linguistic skills targeted by the platform, the teaching of foreign languages on this method has turned into a problem for students and institutions at the same time, in light of the difficulties facing students in accessing digital space, and the great shortage of human resources and logistical supplies required by the use of this type of means in education.
The network considered that “there is an urgent need to return to the joint trunk system between all specializations of legal sciences during the first four seasons, and review and reset the conditions for access and work ‘the paths of excellence’, in order to give them a guarantee befitting in its name, as well as reviewing some aspects of teaching units affiliated with strength and languages.”
The network of heads of the people of public law has caused the attention of all concerned parties to these issues that present themselves in an urgent way, and considered that “its treatment needs an internal dialogue at the level of university institutions that study the law, especially between the various people that embrace them; Given the importance of the roles and pedagogical functions that the people play as elected bodies within higher education institutions.
The network of heads of the people of public law in Morocco expressed its “full willingness to cooperate and coordinate with colleagues in the people of private law, economy and management, evoking in this regard the important coordination and constructive work that the people of private and public law began during the period in which the Bachelor’s regime was presented.”
The conclusion of the communication stated that “the network considers that the second national forum for the people of the public law, which announces its convening before the continuity of the current university year, in the date and place that will be informed later, will be an appropriate opportunity for further deepening the discussion and clarifying visions on these issues, and preparing an integrated evaluation of the proceeds of the pedagogical reform at the level of university institutions that study the law. It will also be suitable to discuss other issues that impose themselves at the present time; In the forefront of which is the amendments to entering it to the law related to the regulation of higher education.
