
Thursday, March 13, 2025 – 01:29
More than 20 associations in the Al -Mazar neighborhood – Kasbah Al -Taher, affiliated with the Ait Melloul Group, called for urgent intervention on “the group’s public lighting interest in implementing the outputs of a previous meeting that concluded to address the problem of public lighting.”
According to a complaint raised to the Inezgane Ait Melloul region worker, it was seen by Hespress, as it was agreed to initiate the installation of lamps to improve lighting in the neighborhood, but no lamp was installed, and everything that was linked to the lighting of lighting except that it is carried out that it is carrying out maintenance work, knowing that its interests work in other neighborhoods, with complete and systematic exclusion of the Al -Mazar neighborhood. “
And the complainant societies, within the same document, reported that the absence of public lighting “exposes the neighborhood population to large security and environmental risks, and negatively affects the quality of life and living conditions, especially with the increasing complaints of citizens from the current situation,” noting that the “Ezuran” association had previously deposited a complaint with the interests of employment regarding the failure of the work to strengthen public lighting in the neighborhood.
The same document reported that this “confirms the procrastination of the public lighting interest and its lack of respect for what was agreed upon, as it shows the lack of interest in the head of the Ait Melloul Group in the development of the Al -Mazar neighborhood, Kasbah Al -Taher, who suffers from exclusion and marginalization, with the official responsible for the spectator.”
The signed societies on the complaint demanded that Inezgane Ait Melloul to intervene urgently to “stop this siege that the lighting interest and the head of the group against the residents of the shrine, Kasbah al -Taher, and hitting an iron hand on all those who hinder the development of the subjects of His Majesty King Mohammed VI, may God support and support him.”
In order to draw the opinion of the collective council, we linked the contact with Hisham Al -Qaisouni, the head of the Ait Melloul group, where he fulfilled it with a copy of the complaint by implementing the immediate messaging and “and” and “after we knew it with our identity and the issue of communication, but he did not respond, despite the confirmation of his receipt with our message.