Analysts: The Gaza Agreement went out of its path and Trump wants to stop the war on its terms

The ceasefire agreement between the Palestinian resistance and Israel is no longer continuing its first state, in the opinion of analysts, after Benjamin Netanyahu disavowed his obligations and the United States began looking for alternative proposals.

It was assumed, according to the agreement – which was reached by an Egyptian -American Qatari mediation – that the occupation forces had withdrawn from the Philadelphia border axis with Egypt, but Netanyahu still rejects this and tries to restore the largest number of neighborhood families while keeping his forces in place.

Meanwhile, the Donald Trump administration began adopting and marketing Netanyahu’s proposals as American proposals, as the Joe Biden administration did, while there are no indications of the possibility of reaching a close agreement.

Use the war paper and aid

While the American envoy Stephen Witkeov and an Israeli delegation of limited powers arrived in Doha to resume negotiations, Israeli media spoke about the possibilities of returning to fight again.

But Israel does not want to return to the war, but rather it wants to use it as a political pressure card, along with the two aid entry paper and the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, says political analyst Saeed Ziyad.

Israel has begun to talk about a new American proposal to put it, and it stipulates a two -month truce in exchange for the launch of 10 Israeli prisoners.

However, Ziyad saw during his participation in the “Path of Events” program, that this proposal confirms the United States’ seeking to restore Israeli prisoners and not to stop the war, “although it does not say that explicitly.”

Also, the current Wittakouf proposal strips the resistance of 40% of the living prisoners, while the Islamic resistance (Hamas) wants to completely stop the war as agreed.

Resistance will not accept

Ziad does not believe that Hamas will agree to these partial proposals through which Netanyahu is trying to buy time, and believes that the mediators also do not want to return to negotiate from the zero point.

On the contrary, Tim Costitan, Vice -ot of the Washington Times Editor -in -Chief, believes that Washington and Tel Aviv do not want war, but they want to restore the prisoners, and end the existence of Hamas in the Strip.

Costitten accused the resistance of violating international law and said that Israel’s use of aid as a pressure card is rejected, but he justified it as a response to “the use of Hamas for the prisoners in the same way.”

Therefore, the ceasefire agreement that was signed for its context came out, and the two parties began alternative proposals that Hamas presented what could be considered an introduction to the implementation of a two -state solution, says Costitan.

While Ziad says that Netanyahu is trying to buy time until the problems of the public budget and the recruitment of the Haredi say, Costitten says that the issue is not a delicious process, and that negotiations were not easy ever in any dispute around the world.

He added, “When we look at the wide image, the important thing that is currently taking place is that there is no fighting or killing for innocent people, and this is a matter that must be preserved through silence guns and allowing the sound of logic until a long -term peace is reached.”

In response to these words, Ziad said that Hamas did not refuse peace and offered from the first day the deal for everyone for all and then returned and repeated the offer last month, while Israel says it will take its families and then return to the war.

From this standpoint, the resistance will never accept these Israeli -American proposals that Ziad says “aims to strip the Palestinians of their weapons in Gaza, which is part of their humiliating peace practiced by the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, in preparation for their displacement, which is something that the Palestinians will not accept and will carry weapons everywhere to prevent it.”

Ihab Jabareen, the expert in the Israeli affairs, did not disagree with Ziad, and he said that Netanyahu did not change and did not abandon the strategy of negotiating for negotiation and buying time by focusing on the details.

The reason for this, as Jabareen says, is that the Israeli Prime Minister wants to obtain everything without paying any political price, and then he made the current negotiation team all of his loyal men who do not have the authority to talk about anything other than extending the first stage of the agreement.

Instead of implementing his humanitarian obligations from which they are dismissed in the first stage, Netanyahu began converting these obligations into concessions that require more in exchange for the second stage negotiations, according to Jabareen.

Correct war errors

However, Jabareen believes that Netanyahu no longer has a significant time because he is subjected to real pressure from extremist government members on the one hand and the families of the prisoners who address Trump directly, on the other hand.

Netanyahu also faces – according to the spokesman – the problem of the United States’s desire to obtain a quick deal away from ending the war that Israel is trying to return to to correct what it considers the mistakes of the previous round.

These mistakes are – in the opinion of Jabareen – that the war was revenge and targeted residents and infrastructures more than targeting the body of the resistance, contrary to what happened with Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Therefore, Israel signed Hezbollah and bound it militarily and politically within 70 days due to the specified and focused strikes of its body and leadership while Hamas remained the same after 15 months of fighting because it was not the only goal of the war, says Jabareen.

Netanyahu’s office spoke closely to ratify plans to return the fighting in the Gaza Strip, while the new Israeli Chief of Staff, Eyal Zamir, pledged to “defeat the enemy, no matter how long,” and said that he would work to achieve a decisive victory in the war.