Two brothers abuse their sister from the father and have a child .. The Court of Appeal is eliminated by life

The Appeal Criminal Court, headed by Counselor Khaled Al -Shabasi, membership of Counselor Mohamed Al -Qurash, Counselor Tamer Al -Fanjari, and Counselor Rami Hamdi, and in the presence of Islam Mustafa, head of the prosecution, were seen by two brothers in life imprisonment after they assaulted their sister from the father and her location over a period of 4 years until one of them carried a thug.

The Appeal Criminal Court tasked with the Public Prosecution to refer the father and mother to the criminal trial on charges of covering up the crime of the minor child at risk and facilitating his deviation in accordance with the child’s law, where they were caught and imprisoned were imprisoned to the trial, as well as the child’s deposit in one of the care homes.

The investigations of the Public Prosecution, in this anomalous crime, wrote to our society, during which a 13 -year -old girl was subjected to the time of the crime, which lasted until she was 17 years old, the two young men, one of whom was 22 years old, and the second 20 years, managed to attack their sister from the father until the signs of pregnancy appeared, and when she pregnant the father and mother covering up the crime, until a prisoner dispute occurred between them and confessed to the incident.

By arresting the two young accused and presented to the Public Prosecution, the defendants confessed to the details of the incident, and the DNA’s genetic fingerprint analysis was conducted for the child who was born from this minor, and the girl of one of them was proven to the child, where they presented the defendants to the first -degree court that sentenced them to the defendants of life imprisonment.

The two defendants, with an appeal against the ruling of the first degree before the Appeal Criminal Court, which supported the sentence of life imprisonment with the amendment of the ruling and the summons of the father and the mother and referred them to the crimes.

The Appeal Criminal Court responded to pushing the accused that the incident was satisfied with the victim, as the ruling on the first degree of righteousness, noting that the child does not exceed 18 years of age and does not consider her consent, and that the sinful relationship lasted 4 years as well as the appearance of signs of pregnancy on her and the parents cover up the incident.

She also noted that she could not tighten the punishment for the accused “execution” if they are only the appellants on the ruling of the first degree, stressing that the defendants were stripped of their feelings and the undermining of the girl who was supposed to have a horse and a honesty, but a shift to wolfs that scattered their display.